Warden

(PC) Chiprez v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20211:21-cv-00668California3,748 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESUS CHIPREZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-00668-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THE FEDERAL CLAIMS BE

v.

DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

WARDEN, et al., FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND THE

COURT DECLINE TO EXERCISE

Defendants. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER

STATE LAW CLAIM

16 (ECF No. 15)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

19 Plaintiff Jesus Chiprez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in in forma 20 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint was 21 screened, and Plaintiff was granted leave to amend. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on 22 August 17, 2021, is before the Court for screening. (Doc. 15.)

I. Screening Requirement and Standard

24 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 25 governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 26 § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.