Lakes

Lakes v. Bath & Body Works, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20212:16-cv-02989California635 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRYSTAL LAKES, No. 2:16-cv-02989-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC., Defendant. 16 In bringing the present Request for Reconsideration (ECF No. 199), Plaintiff Crystal Lakes (“Plaintiff”) asks this Court to reverse the Magistrate Judge’s December 29, 2020, Order (ECF No. 198) denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Conduct Limited Discovery. ECF No. 178. Plaintiff’s Motion urges the Court to reopen discovery, which has now been closed for over three years, on grounds that Defendant Bath & Body Works, LLC, (“Defendant”) has not been forthcoming in representing that no documents evidencing the “silent recall” of three-wick candles existed. On July 9, 2021, (ECF No. 202) the Court already rejected the same arguments in declining Plaintiff’s earlier reconsideration request (ECF No. 175) as to the Magistrate Judge’s denial of Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order to Show Cause re Contempt and for Sanctions. ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.