Matevousian

(PC) Brown v. Matevousian

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20211:20-cv-00204California686 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARVIS BROWN, No. 1:20-cv-00204-NONE-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED

ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, et al., WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND Defendants. (Doc. No. 23) 16 Plaintiff Jarvis Brown is a federal inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This action proceeds on plaintiff’s second amended complaint against fifteen named and four Doe defendants for violations of plaintiff’s Fifth and Eighth Amendment rights. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 31, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s second amended complaint be dismissed without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.