Melgarejo

(PC) Corral v. Melgarejo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20212:18-cv-03019California5,256 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DYLAN SCOTT CORRAL, No. 2:18-CV-3019-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MELGAREJO et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 48. The motion for summary judgment covers only three of the five defendants in this case: Dr. John Baker, Pamela Johansen, and Darryl Hickerson. Id. The motion does not apply to Defendants Sonia Melgarejo or Loren Bouldin. See id. Defendants Melgarejo and Bouldin filed a statement of non-opposition indicated that they do not oppose granting the motion. ECF No. 49. Plaintiff, however, does oppose the motion. ECF Nos. 52, 54, 56. Broadly, Defendants contend that summary judgment is appropriate because Plaintiff refused medical care and because they, as medical staff, are not responsible for the cell conditions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.