Lopez

(PC) Lupercio v. Lopez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20211:21-cv-00240California1,659 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 RAMON NAVARRO LUPERCIO, Case No. 1:21-cv-00240-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE

COURT TO ASSIGN A FRESNO DISTRICT

v. JUDGE LOPEZ, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION,

Defendants. WITH PREJUDICE, FOR THE FAILURE TO

STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM

13 (ECF No. 14, 15, 18)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff Ramon Navarro Lupercio (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 17 forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed a first amended 18 complaint without first waiting for screening of the original complaint. Plaintiff’s first amended 19 complaint, filed on March 3, 2021, is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. 15.)

I. Screening Requirement and Standard

21 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 22 governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.