Majesky

(PS) Wheeler v. Majesky

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20212:20-cv-01705California777 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZACKERY WHEELER, Case No. 2:20-cv-01705-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THE COURT DISMISS THIS CASE

v. FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURES TO

PROSECUTE AND TO COMPLY WITH

MATTHEW MAJESKY, et al., COURT ORDERS Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS 16 17 On November 24, 2020, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 9. In violation of Local Rule 230(c), plaintiff failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion. Accordingly, on January 13, 2021, I ordered plaintiff to show cause within thirty days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order, and the time to do so has now passed. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.