Foltz
Foltz v. GEICO Indemnity Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMIE LYNN FOLTZ, No. 1:21-cv-00131-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO REMAND
GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, and Does 1 through 25, inclusive, (Doc. No. 9) 15 Defendants.
17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff Jamie Lynn Foltz’s motion to remand this action to the Fresno County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 9.) Pursuant to General Order No. 617 addressing the public health emergency posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, on February 24, 2021, plaintiff’s motion was taken under submission on the papers. (Doc. No. 10.) The court has considered the submissions of counsel, and for the reasons discussed below, will deny the motion to remand. BACKGROUND On June 5, 2020, plaintiff filed the complaint against defendant in Fresno County Superior Court asserting the following four claims: (1) breach of written contract, (2) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing,…