Raimondo
California Natural Resources Agency v. Raimondo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF No. 1:20−cv−00431−DAD−EPG FISHERMEN’S ASSOCIATIONS, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY
Plaintiff, UNTIL SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 13 v. (Doc. No. 271) 14 WILBUR ROSS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 THE CALIFORNIA NATURAL No. 1:20-cv-00426-DAD-EPG RESOURCES AGENCY, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY
Plaintiffs, UNTIL SEPTEMBER 30, 2021
v. (Doc. No. 185)
21 WILBUR ROSS, et al., 22 Defendants. 23
/////
/////
/////
///// Plaintiffs1 in the above-captioned actions bring closely related claims against the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”), the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (“Reclamation”), and various official representatives of those agencies (collectively, “Federal Defendants”). (CNRA, Doc. No. 51; PCFFA, Doc. No. 52.) Both cases involve challenges to the adoption by…