(PC) Ruiz v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20211:20-cv-00893California614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 GEORGE RUIZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-00893-AWI-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-

v. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KEN CLARK, et al., (ECF Nos. 35) Defendants.

14 Plaintiff George Ruiz is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 15, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that Plaintiff failed to administratively exhaust any claim brought in the complaint. (ECF No. 35). Defendants also filed a notice of request to seal documents, seeking to “to seal Exhibit B to the declarations of J. Mendez and H. Moseley filed in support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Exhaustion) (ECF No. 35).” (ECF No. 36). The Court granted permission to seal the exhibits but directed Defendants to file, no later than July 23, 2021, a redacted version of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.