Lake

Lake v. Hatanaka

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20212:18-cv-02013California1,784 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JAMES LAKE, No. 2:18-cv-02013 JAM-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS TERRY HATANAKA, ET AL., Defendants. 17 Pending before this Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). ECF No. 57. The SAC contains three claims alleging violations of federal statutes and twenty four state law claims. ECF No. 55. Plaintiff alleges that this Court has federal question and diversity jurisdiction over these claims. See SAC. Plaintiff also requests that the Court exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims. See SAC. The parties were ordered to file supplemental

1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for May 4, 2021. briefs on the issue of diversity jurisdiction. ECF No. 64. The Court has received, read and considered these briefs, ECF Nos. 77 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.