(HC) Findley v. County of El Dorado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN EDWARD FINDLEY, No. 2:21-cv-1117 KJM AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER COUNTY OF EL DORADO, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On June 25, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 4. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the…