Campos

(PC) Dijkstra v. Campos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20211:21-cv-01223California445 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CODY DIJKSTRA, Case No. 1:21-cv-01223-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN

v. FORMA PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE

DENIED

CAMPOS, et al., (Doc. No. 2) Defendants.

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Cody Dijkstra, a prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 12, 2021. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff accompanied the filing of his complaint with an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. No. 2). The certified trust account submitted by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation in support of Plaintiff’s IFP application reflects a balance of $1,110.21 as of August 16, 2021. (Doc. No. 6). This amount well exceeds the $402.00 filing fee for this action. Plaintiff is therefore ordered to show cause why he meets the indigence requirement for eligibility to proceed IFP. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.