Woodfill

(PC) Ruiz v. Woodfill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20212:19-cv-02118California449 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2:19-cv-2118 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER D. WOODFILL, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis. On June 30, 2021, the undersigned recommended that defendants’ motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status be granted, and that plaintiff be required to pay the court’s filing fee in full before this action may proceed. On August 6, 2021, plaintiff was granted an additional thirty days in which to file objections. On August 9, 2021, plaintiff filed a second motion for extension of time, stating he had not received a ruling on his prior request. Plaintiff also renewed his request that the court appoint an interpreter. In light of the order granting plaintiff additional time to file objections, plaintiff’s second motion is denied as moot. As to plaintiff’s renewed request for an interpreter, plaintiff was previously informed that this court lacks…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.