Arroyo

Arroyo v. Capitol Regency, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20212:21-cv-00983California1,609 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Rafael Arroyo, No. 2:21-cv-00983-KJM-KIN Plaintiff, ORDER Vv. Capitol Regency, LLC et al., Defendants. 16 Defendants Capitol Regency and Hyatt Corporation move to dismiss Rafael Arroyo’s complaint. In his opposition Arroyo asserts this court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over this matter. The court agrees. The court remands this matter to Sacramento County Superior Court and denies the motion to dismiss as moot. I. BACKGROUND Arroyo is a paraplegic and uses a wheelchair. Compl. 4 1, Not. of Removal Ex. A, ECF No.1. Arroyo planned to visit Sacramento in April 2021 and went to defendants’ website to book aroom. Id. 99] 15, 18. He claims the website did not “provide[] enough information about accessibility features” for him to “independently assess whether the rooms worked for him.” Jd. 4 16, 20-21. This deterred him from making a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.