Wilson

Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Wilson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20212:20-cv-01419California415 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY No. 2:20-cv-1419 TLN DB

INSURANCE COMPANY,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. ROGER WALTER WILSON; PHILIP

WIEGMAN; LAKESHORE PACIFIC

ENTERPRISES, INC.; LAKESHORE

PACIFIC NEVADA, INC.; DANIELLE

ALVES; KIMBERLY GRAY; MISTY

POIESZ,

18 Defendants. 20 On July 29, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment and noticed the motion for hearing before the undersigned on August 27, 2021, pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(19). (ECF No. 29.) It does not appear, however, that plaintiff filed proof of service of notice of the motion on the defendants. It is true that service of a motion for default judgement on a defaulting party is not required. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2) (requiring that written notice of an application for default judgment be served upon the party against whom judgment is sought only if that party “has appeared in the action”); Local Rule 135(d) (excusing parties from serving documents //// submitted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.