Wilson
Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Wilson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY No. 2:20-cv-1419 TLN DB
INSURANCE COMPANY,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. ROGER WALTER WILSON; PHILIP
WIEGMAN; LAKESHORE PACIFIC
ENTERPRISES, INC.; LAKESHORE
PACIFIC NEVADA, INC.; DANIELLE
ALVES; KIMBERLY GRAY; MISTY
POIESZ,
18 Defendants. 20 On July 29, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment and noticed the motion for hearing before the undersigned on August 27, 2021, pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(19). (ECF No. 29.) It does not appear, however, that plaintiff filed proof of service of notice of the motion on the defendants. It is true that service of a motion for default judgement on a defaulting party is not required. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2) (requiring that written notice of an application for default judgment be served upon the party against whom judgment is sought only if that party “has appeared in the action”); Local Rule 135(d) (excusing parties from serving documents //// submitted…