Baugham

(PC) Singleton v. Baugham

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20212:18-cv-02633California367 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DE’VON-SAMUEL JAMES- No. 2:18-cv-02633 TLN DB P

SINGLETON PERKINS,

11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v.

D. BAUGHAM, et al.,

14 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated May 25, 2021, the court screened the plaintiff’s first amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and determined it did not contain any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff was given thirty days leave to file an amended complaint and warned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (ECF No. 16 at 9.) Those thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, requested additional time to file an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.