Gastelum

Gastelum v. Dick's Sporting Goods Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20211:21-cv-01289California341 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FERNANDO GASTELUM, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-1289 NONE JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE v. ) FILING FEE OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED ) IN FORMA PAUPERIS DICK’S SPORTING GOODS, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) )

Plaintiff initiated an action by filing a complaint on August 24, 2021. As a general rule, all parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a United States District Court must pay a filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The Court may authorize the commencement of an action without the filing fee “by a person who submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such [person] possesses that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefore.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Therefore, an action may proceed despite a failure to prepay the filing fee only if leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted by the Court. See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). The matter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.