(PC) Cortinas v. Gill, Jr.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20211:18-cv-00515California450 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY WILLIAMS CORTINAS, Case No. 1:18-cv-00515-NONE-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE

v. SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADING

RAVIJOT GILL, JR., et al., FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD Defendants. (Doc. No. 36) 16 Plaintiff Larry Williams Cortinas, a state prisoner, initiated this action on April 10, 2018 by filing a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff is proceeding on his first amended complaint. (Doc. No. 17). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to file a supplemental complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(d). (Doc. No. 36). It is within the court’s discretion as to whether to permit the filing of a supplemental complaint. Howard v. City of Coos Bay, 871 F.3d 1032, 1040 (9th Cir. 2017) (“only at the district court's discretion are parties permitted to file a supplemental complaint”). In his one-page…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.