Neuschmid

(PC) Swafford v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20212:19-cv-02269California2,183 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEE SWAFFORD, No. 2:19-CV-2269-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROBERT NEUSCHMID, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint. See ECF No. 11. The Court previously dismissed Plaintiff’s original complaint with leave to amend because it was vague and excessively long, including hundreds of attached documents. ECF No. 8. The complaint was also vague. Id. The Court concluded that the complaint did not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. Id. Because Plaintiff has still not stated a claim for relief, the Court dismisses the second amended complaint with leave to amend. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court must screen complaints from prisoners seeking relief against a governmental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.