(PC) Taylor v. Commissioner of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 PRESTON TAYLOR, Case No. 1:20-cv-00798-SAB
12 Plaintiff, ORDER ENTERING STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
13 v. (ECF No. 37) 14 P. TURNER, 15 Defendant.
16
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
17 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 18 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action is likely to involve production of 19 confidential or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from 20 use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, 21 Plaintiff Preston Taylor and Defendant P. Turner stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the 22 following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer 23 blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords 24 from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled 25 to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, 26 as set forth in Section 12.3 below, that…