(SS) Tinoco v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20211:21-cv-00278California481 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARGARET ELIZABETH TINOCO, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-0278 JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE )

WHY THE ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. ) ) DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) THE COURT’S ORDER AND FAILURE TO ) PROSECUTE Defendant. ) )

Margaret Elizabeth Tinoco initiated this action by filing a complaint on February 26, 2021, seeking judicial review of the decision to deny an application for Social Security benefits. (Doc. 1) On July 1, 2021, the Commissioner filed the administrative record. (Doc. 6.) On June 15, 2021, the Court issued an amended Scheduling Order, setting forth briefing deadlines for the action. (Doc. 7.) Pursuant to the terms of the Scheduling Order, Plaintiff was to file a motion for summary judgment within forty-five days of the date of service of the Court’s order. (Doc. 7 at 1.) Thus, Plaintiff was to serve an opening brief no later than August 20, 2021. However,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.