Gee

(PC) Bradford v. Gee

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20212:20-cv-00714California1,013 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, Case No. 2:20-cv-00714-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT

ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS

v. CASE

S. GEE, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT:

Defendants.

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED WITHOUT

LEAVE TO AMEND

16 ECF No. 23

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER BE

DENIED

19 ECF No. 25 20 21 After previously filing two deficient complaints, plaintiff has filed a second amended complaint. ECF No. 23. I find that this new complaint fails to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Additionally, plaintiff has ignored my warning that unrelated claims against multiple defendants cannot proceed in a single action. See ECF No. 17 at 4. Having already given plaintiff two opportunities to amend, I will recommend that his second amended complaint be dismissed without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.