Nueschmid

(PC) Shepherd v. Nueschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20212:19-cv-00084California4,141 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIORNIA 10 CAMERON SHEPHERD, No. 2:19-cv-084 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. CORNWELL, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendant violated his Eighth Amendment rights by binding him too tightly during contraband surveillance watch (“CSW”) and that defendant was negligent and caused plaintiff emotional distress when he told plaintiff to drink a lot of water and left him for an hour without permitting him to urinate. Before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, this court will recommend defendant’s motion be granted. BACKGROUND This case is proceeding on plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”). (ECF No. 17.) At the time of the events at issue, plaintiff was incarcerated at California State Prison-Solano. Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.