Trujillo

Trujillo v. Harsarb Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20211:21-cv-00342California11,677 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:21-cv-00342-NONE-SAB 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DENYING v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE HARSARB, INC., et al., (ECF No. 12) Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

16 I. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Jose Trujillo’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for default judgment filed on July 16, 2021. (ECF No. 12.) On August 25, 2021, the Court held a hearing on the motion for default judgment, at which no appearances were made on behalf of Defendants Harsarb, Inc., dba A1 Step & Save (“Harsarb Inc.”), and Harsarb Firm, LLC (“Harsarb Firm”) (“Defendants”). Having considered the moving papers, the declarations and exhibits attached thereto, arguments and non-appearance at the August 25, 2021…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.