Mendoza
(PC) Rodriguez v. Mendoza
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERLINDO RODRIGUEZ, JR., Case No. 1:21-cv-00410-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO
v. ACTION MENDOZA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN
Defendants. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (ECF Nos. 1, 10, 12)
FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE
17 I. Background Plaintiff Erlindo Rodriguez, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 12, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff stated cognizable claims for failure to protect and excessive force against Defendant Mendoza in violation of the Eighth Amendment and for excessive force against Defendant Cambell in violation of the Eighth Amendment, but failed to state any other cognizable claims against any other defendants. (ECF No. 10.) The Court ordered Plaintiff…