King

(PC) Dalke v. King

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20211:20-cv-00534California1,194 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSHUA JASON DALKE, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00534-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, )

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

) v. ) RECONSIDERATION OF THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S AUGUST 11, 2021 ORDER

KING CLARK, et al., ) ) (ECF No. 125) Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Joshua Jason Dalke is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s August 11, 2021 order denying his third request for appointment of counsel, filed August 23, 2021. The standard of review on a motion for reconsideration of a magistrate judge's ruling on a non- dispositive matter is “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); E.D. Cal. L.R. 303(f). Under that standard, “[a] party seeking reconsideration must set forth facts or law of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.