Santiago

(PC) Arzaga v. Santiago

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20212:18-cv-00313California702 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL ARZAGA, No. 2:18-cv-0313 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER E. SANTIAGO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 9, 2021, plaintiff was granted an additional 90 days in which to serve defendant Santiago, and to identify, locate and serve defendants Haluik and Victoriano. (ECF No. 83.) On July 30, 2021, the undersigned ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms required to effect service on such defendants. On August 19, 2021, plaintiff submitted the USM-285 forms. However, plaintiff provided the following address: Dept. of Treasury, Internal Revenue Services, Fresno, CA 99999-0000, and stated that this agency will be able to provide the address for service for each of the defendants. //// 26 Defendant E. Santiago was identified, and a service packet was forwarded to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.