(HC) Quill v. State of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOPHIA QUILL, No. 2:21-CV-1044-DMC-P Petitioner,

ORDER

v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s motion for the appointment of counsel, ECF No. 3. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case “if the interests of justice so require.” In the present case, Petitioner offers no compelling evidence of the need for appointed counsel, and the Court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time. While Petitioner states that she is incarcerated, indigent, untrained in the law, and unable to go to the…