(HC) James v. People of the State of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD EUGENE JAMES, No. 2:21-CV-1005-TLN-DMC-P Petitioner,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA,

15 Respondent.

17 Petitioner, a pre-trial detainee proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 15, filed as of right and which supersedes the amended petition at ECF No. 14. Rule 4 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases provides for summary dismissal of a habeas petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” In the instant case, it is plain that Petitioner is not entitled to federal habeas relief. / / / / / / / / / Petitioner makes clear that he is a pre-trial detainee awaiting a trial in state court oncriminal…