(PC) Warzek v. Valley State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20211:20-cv-00027California1,095 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL WARZEK, 1:20-cv-00027-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

vs. PROCEED AGAINST DEFENDANTS FISHER,

PAEZ, ANGUIANO, CHAPAS, LUCERO,

VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., MARQUEZ, CRUZ, AND MOOSEBAUR FOR

VIOLATION OF RLUIPA, VIOLATION OF

Defendants. THE FIRST AMENDMENT FREE EXERCISE

CLAUSE, AND ADVERSE CONDITIONS OF

CONFINEMENT IN VIOLATION OF THE

EIGHTH AMENDMENT; AGAINST

DEFENDANTS FISHER AND MOOSEBAUR

FOR FAILURE TO PROTECT PLAINTIFF IN

VIOLATION OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT;

AND AGAINST DEFENDANT MOOSEBAUR

FOR RETALIATION IN VIOLATION OF THE

FIRST AMENDMENT; AND THAT ALL

OTHER CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE

DISMISSED

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS

22 Plaintiff Michael Warzek is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.