(PC) Warzek v. Valley State Prison
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20211:20-cv-00027California1,095 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL WARZEK, 1:20-cv-00027-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION
vs. PROCEED AGAINST DEFENDANTS FISHER,
PAEZ, ANGUIANO, CHAPAS, LUCERO,
VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., MARQUEZ, CRUZ, AND MOOSEBAUR FOR
VIOLATION OF RLUIPA, VIOLATION OF
Defendants. THE FIRST AMENDMENT FREE EXERCISE
CLAUSE, AND ADVERSE CONDITIONS OF
CONFINEMENT IN VIOLATION OF THE
EIGHTH AMENDMENT; AGAINST
DEFENDANTS FISHER AND MOOSEBAUR
FOR FAILURE TO PROTECT PLAINTIFF IN
VIOLATION OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT;
AND AGAINST DEFENDANT MOOSEBAUR
FOR RETALIATION IN VIOLATION OF THE
FIRST AMENDMENT; AND THAT ALL
OTHER CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE
DISMISSED
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS
22 Plaintiff Michael Warzek is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights…