(PS) Sayyedalhosseini v. USCIS Sacramento Field Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20212:21-cv-00207California611 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SONIA SAYYEDALHOSSEINI, No. 2:21-cv-0207 JAM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER USCIS SACRAMENTO FILED OFFICE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Sonia Sayyedalhosseini is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff commenced this action on February 2, 2021, by filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) On March 1, 2021, plaintiff filed a purported proof of service on the defendant. (ECF No. 4.) On April 20, 2021, pursuant to plaintiff’s request, the Clerk entered defendant’s default. (ECF No. 6.) On April 28, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment. (ECF No. 7.) On May 20, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion for citizenship. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff’s motions, however, were not noticed for hearing in violation of Local Rule 230. Moreover, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.