O'Campo

(PC) Crump v. O'Campo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20212:20-cv-02343California1,907 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVE CRUMP, No. 2: 20-cv-2343 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

A. O’CAMPO, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds without counsel and with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (ECF No. 38.) For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends that defendant’s motion be granted. Background Following allegedly conflicting responses as to whether defendant O’Campo would renew plaintiff’s single cell chrono, plaintiff filed health care grievances against O’Campo based on her revoking his single cell status. In retaliation for such grievances, defendant O’Campo allegedly threatened to house plaintiff with a gang member, then, through “intimidation, threats of harm and fear,” told plaintiff that O’Campo “would reduce…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.