(PC) Morgan v. Valley State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20211:20-cv-00029California1,088 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MATTHEW WILKE MORGAN, 1:20-cv-00029-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

vs. PROCEED AGAINST DEFENDANTS FISHER,

PAEZ, ANGUIANO, CHAPAS, LUCERO,

VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., MARQUEZ, CRUZ, AND MOOSEBAUR FOR

VIOLATION OF RLUIPA, VIOLATION OF

Defendants. THE FIRST AMENDMENT FREE EXERCISE

CLAUSE, AND ADVERSE CONDITIONS OF

CONFINEMENT IN VIOLATION OF THE

EIGHTH AMENDMENT; AGAINST

DEFENDANT FISHER FOR FAILURE TO

PROTECT PLAINTIFF IN VIOLATION OF

THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT; AND AGAINST

DEFENDANT MOOSEBAUR FOR

RETALIATION IN VIOLATION OF THE FIRST

AMENDMENT; AND THAT ALL OTHER

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS

23 Plaintiff Matthew Wilke Morgan is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.