Soto De Cortes v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20211:21-cv-00107California210 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 DELFINA SOTO DE CORTES, Case No. 1:21-cv-00107-DAD-EPG Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR

v. DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH

PREJUDICE AND STIPULATION TO

CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS RETAIN JURISDICTION

CORPORATION,

14 Defendant. (ECF Nos. 18, 19) 15 oo. The parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss, with prejudice, the entire action, with each 17 party bearing their own attorney fees and costs associated with the action except as otherwise 18 agreed in their settlement agreement, and a stipulation for the Court to retain jurisdiction over 19 this matter to enforce the settlement agreement. (ECF Nos. 18, 19). In light of the stipulations, 20 the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. 21 City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Court retains jurisdiction over this 22 matter for the sole purpose of enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement. Accordingly, 23 the Clerk of the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.