(PC) Long v. Corizon Health, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20211:17-cv-00898California1,131 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHILLIP J. LONG, Case No. 1:17-cv-00898-NONE-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF

v. TIME (Doc. 39) CORIZON HEALTH, INC., et al.,

AMENDED FINDINGS AND

Defendants. RECOMMENTIONS TO DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Doc. 38) 16 14-DAY DEADLINE 17 This action proceeds against a single Jane Doe defendant on an Eighth Amendment claim brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Docs. 11, 12.) Despite extensions of time and discovery efforts, Plaintiff has been unable to identify Jane Doe for service of process. Plaintiff seeks additional time to identify the defendant. (Doc. 39.) However, the Court finds that Plaintiff is unable to advance this litigation and recommends that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to effect service of process. The defendant is described as a female nurse who worked at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.