Harkless

Harkless v. Pacific Power and Light

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20212:18-cv-02903California3,431 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES HARKLESS, No. 2:18-cv-02903-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER PACIFIC POWER AND LIGHT, Defendant. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff James Harkless’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Amend the Complaint (ECF No. 19), Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 51), and Motion to Modify the Pretrial Scheduling Order (ECF No. 72). Also before the Court is Defendant PacifiCorp’s1 (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 23) and Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 27). All the pending motions have been fully briefed. After carefully considering the parties’ briefing and for the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (ECF No. 19), DENIES the Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 23, 51) and Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 72) as moot, and DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 27).

Defendant was erroneously sued as “Pacific Power and Light.” The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.