Stearns

Delta Zeta Sorority v. Stearns

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20211:20-cv-00419California3,710 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DELTA ZETA SORORITY, et al., No. 1:20-cv-00419-DAD-SAB Plaintiffs, v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS, CHANGE VENUE,

AIMEE STEARNS, an individual doing AND EXTEND TIME AND GRANTING business as MOONLIGHTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT EMBROIDERY AND SCREEN ON THE PLEADINGS

PRINTING,

(Doc. Nos. 21, 26) Defendant.

18 This matter is before the court on the motion to dismiss, to change venue, and to extend time in order to obtain counsel filed by defendant Aimee Stearns on October 26, 2020 (Doc. No. 21) and the motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by plaintiffs Delta Zeta Sorority, Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity, and Sigma Chi Corporation (collectively “plaintiffs”) on January 15, 2021 (Doc. No. 26). Pursuant to General Order No. 617 addressing the public health emergency posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the motions were taken under submission on the papers. (Doc. No. 27.) For…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.