Depovic

(PC) Lipsey, Jr. v. Depovic

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20211:18-cv-00767California659 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR., Case No. 1:18-cv-00767-NONE-HBK

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

SEEKING ADVISORY OPINION

v. (Doc. No. 48) DR. DEPOVIC, et al.,

Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s pleading titled “Equitable Prompt Review and Ruling” filed August 19, 2021. (Doc. No. 48). The pleading seeks “to have the court to decide the timeframe in which the defendants are entitled to plaintiffs [sic] medical records.” (Id. at 2 ¶¶ 22-26.). Liberally construed, Plaintiff appears to ask the Court to advise him as to the appropriate period for which his medical records are relevant and thus discoverable. At the outset, the Court does not render advisory rulings. There is neither a pending discovery motion nor a motion for a protective order before the Court. The Court had set this matter for a status conference and intended to discuss any discovery issues or disputes with the parties at that hearing. Plaintiff,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.