Pfeiffer

(HC) Holguin v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20211:20-cv-01715California8,401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FELIPE ROMAN HOLGUIN, Case No. 1:20-cv-01715-NONE-HBK Petitioner, PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR AN

EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND

v. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

INCORPORATED IN HIS PETITION AND

CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, OPPOSITION ARE DENIED Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

DISMISS1

(Doc. No. 8) FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 19 Petitioner Felipe Roman Holguin (“Petitioner” or “Holguin”), a state prisoner is 20 proceeding on his pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 constructively 21 filed on November 29, 2020. (Doc. No. 1, “Petition”). In response, Respondent filed a motion 22 to dismiss the Petition as untimely on February 9, 2021. (Doc. No. 8). Respondent submitted 23 exhibits in support of its Motion. (Doc. No. 10). After being granted an extension of time, 24 25 1 This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.