Nunes
Nunes v. Stephens
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANGELINA NUNES, individually and as CASE NO. 1:19-CV-0204 AWI BAM guardian ad litem for minor children D.X. and L.X., et al.,
ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY
Plaintiffs DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS
TO DISMISS AND ORDER STAYING
v. CASE
CARRIE STEPHENS, et. al, (Doc. Nos. 66 and 67) Defendants
13 14 This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case stems from the allegedly unauthorized and unconstitutional access of Plaintiffs’ confidential juvenile records by the two remaining Defendants, Stanislaus County (“the County”) and the law firm of Arata, Swingle, Van Egmond & Goodwin, PLC (“ASVG”). The active complaint is the Second Amended Complaint, which contains two Monell claims against Defendants. Currently pending before the Court are Defendants’ respective Rule 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss. Procedurally, the Ninth Circuit reversed this Court’s denial of qualified immunity to three individual Defendants. See Nunes v. Arata, Swingle, Van Egmond & Goodwin (PLC), 983 F.3d…