Nunes

Nunes v. Stephens

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20211:19-cv-00204California1,018 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANGELINA NUNES, individually and as CASE NO. 1:19-CV-0204 AWI BAM guardian ad litem for minor children D.X. and L.X., et al.,

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY

Plaintiffs DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS

TO DISMISS AND ORDER STAYING

v. CASE

CARRIE STEPHENS, et. al, (Doc. Nos. 66 and 67) Defendants

13 14 This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case stems from the allegedly unauthorized and unconstitutional access of Plaintiffs’ confidential juvenile records by the two remaining Defendants, Stanislaus County (“the County”) and the law firm of Arata, Swingle, Van Egmond & Goodwin, PLC (“ASVG”). The active complaint is the Second Amended Complaint, which contains two Monell claims against Defendants. Currently pending before the Court are Defendants’ respective Rule 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss. Procedurally, the Ninth Circuit reversed this Court’s denial of qualified immunity to three individual Defendants. See Nunes v. Arata, Swingle, Van Egmond & Goodwin (PLC), 983 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.