(PC)Figueroa

(PC)Figueroa v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20211:19-cv-00968California884 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUBEN FIGUEROA, Case No. 1:19-cv-00968-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT

COUNSEL

v. (ECF No. 51) CLARK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Ruben Figueroa (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Baughman, Clark, Gallagher, Alfaro, Goss, Juarez, Hence, and Llamas for failure to provide outside exercise in violation of the Eighth Amendment and against Defendants Baughman, Clark, Goss, Hence, Gallagher, Llamas, and Gamboa for violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel, filed August 30, 2021. (ECF No. 51.) In his motion, Plaintiff states that he is seeking appointment of counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006(a)(2)(B). Plaintiff argues that appointment of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.