(SS) (CONSENT) Frits v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20212:19-cv-02371California3,351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IRINA FRITS, No. 2:19-cv-2371 DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security1, 15 Defendant. 17 This social security action was submitted to the court without oral argument for ruling on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment.2 Plaintiff’s motion argues that the Administrative Law Judge erred at step two of the sequential evaluation, failed to account for all of plaintiff’s impairments, and erred with respect to plaintiff’s English language competency finding. ////

1 After the filing of this action Kilolo Kijakazi was appointed Acting Commissioner of Social Security and has, therefore, been substituted as the defendant. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (referring to the “Commissioner’s Answer”); 20 C.F.R. § 422.210(d) (“the person holding the Office of the Commissioner shall, in his official capacity, be the proper defendant”). 27 2 Both…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.