Burlingham
(PS) Young v. Burlingham
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL CHRISTOPHER YOUNG, et al., No. 2:21-cv-00537-TLN-KJN Plaintiffs, ORDER v. STEVEN RICHARD BURLINGHAM, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiffs proceed in this civil action without counsel. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c)(21). On August 6, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed.1 Accordingly, the Court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
Plaintiff Daniel Christopher Young filed a purported First Amended Complaint on August 18, 2021, which is signed only…