Zakhary

(PC) Prestfield v. Zakhary

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20211:20-cv-01551California1,694 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER PRESTFIELD, Case No. 1:20-cv-01551-NONE-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A

v. COMPETENCY HEARING AND FOR

APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO COUNSEL,

GEORGE M. ZAKHARY, (ECF NO. 34) Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Christopher Prestfield is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds on Plaintiff’s claim that Defendant violated his 14th Amendment rights by failing to obtain his informed consent in operating on Plaintiff to repair a facial fracture because Defendant did not advise Plaintiff of the specific risk of severe post-operative neurological pain. (ECF No. 5). On August 30, 2021, Plaintiff filed a “petition requesting psychiatric review of Plaintiff and possible appointment of counsel for mental health reasons or other measures.” (ECF No. 34). For the reasons that follow,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.