Sherman

(PC) Sharpe v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20211:19-cv-00711California10,288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM SHARPE, No. 1:19-cv-00711-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS’

v.

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE

C. CRYER, et al., DENIED

Defendants. (ECF No. 65)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS

17

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Adam Sharpe is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds on Plaintiff’s remaining claims from his complaint alleging that Defendants C. Cryer, J. Lewis, and S. Gates were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (See ECF Nos. 1, 33, 66). On May 24, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that, because they were only involved in Plaintiff’s appeals for medical care at the administrative level, lacked medical training or the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.