Kramer

(PC) Stafford v. Kramer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20211:15-cv-00038California359 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM STAFFORD, No. 1:15-cv-00038-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff ORDER VACATING AUGUST 17, 2021

AMENDED JUDGMENT

v. (Doc. No. 27) 14 NORM KRAMER, et al.,

ORDER AMENDING JUDGMENT

Defendants. 17 On June 10, 2021, the Ninth Circuit issued a memorandum decision in this matter directing this court to enter an amended judgment. (Doc. No. 24.) On August 17, 2021, at the direction of the assigned magistrate judge, the Clerk of the Court entered an amended judgment in accordance with the Ninth Circuit’s instructions. (Doc. Nos. 26, 27.) However, the Ninth Circuit had yet to issue its mandate. Therefore, this court inadvertently acted before it had jurisdiction to amend the judgment. United States v. Waknine, 409 Fed. Appx. 72, 74 (9th Cir. 2010)1; see also In re Ashai, No. 2:13-BK-11265-ER, 2017 WL 5495501, at *4 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2017). Accordingly, the August 17, 2021 amended judgment is VACATED. ///// 27 Citation to this unpublished…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.