(SS) Saltzman v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20212:18-cv-02215California982 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SANDRA SALTZMAN, No. 2:18-CV-2215-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brought this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Final judgement was entered on December 6, 2019. See ECF No. 21. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for an award of attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $10,160.04 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). See ECF No. 22. Because this court issued a remand pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), plaintiff is a prevailing party for EAJA purposes. See Flores v. Shalala, 42 F.3d 562 (9th Cir. 1995). Under the EAJA, an award of reasonable attorney’s fees is appropriate unless the Commissioner’s position was “substantially justified” on law and fact with respect to the issue(s) on which the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.