Parriot

(PC) Smith v. Parriot

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20211:19-cv-00286California828 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH, 1:19-cv-00286-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

vs. (ECF No. 36.)

BRIAN L. PARRIOT, et al.,

Defendants.

16 I. BACKGROUND Lawrence Christopher Smith (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on February 14, 2019, in the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) On March 4, 2019, the case was transferred to this court. (ECF No. 3.) On September 10, 2020, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 22.) On January 19, 2021, the court found the First Amended Complaint appropriate for service and directed e-service on defendants Andres Cantu, Wilfredo Gutierrez, and J. Mattingly (“Defendants”). (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.