(PC) Stamper v. Lassen County Adult Detention Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20212:20-cv-01251California346 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NEIL STAMPER, No. 2:20-cv-1251 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER LASSEN COUNTY ADULT DETINTION FACILITY, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and an application to proceed in forma pauperis, both while incarcerated in Lassen County. The case was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On August 6, 2020, plaintiff filed a change of address notice which indicates that he been released from custody. ECF No. 5. Because different forms and procedures apply to prisoners and non- prisoners seeking to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff will be required to submit a new application. Upon release, a former prisoner must be allowed to apply to proceed under general in forma pauperis provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). See DeBlasio v. Gilmore, 315 F.3d 396, 399 (4th Cir. 2003); see also Webb v. Lambert, No. CV 12-00041-H-DLC,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.