Hasem

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY D. RAY, No. 2:21-cv-0072 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER O. HASEM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se. He seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Before the court are plaintiff’s motion for a forty-five-day extension of time to file an in forma pauperis application, ECF No. 9, and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 10. Approximately six weeks after filing his in forma pauperis application, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address. ECF No. 11. It appears from the notice that plaintiff is no longer incarcerated. Upon release from prison, a former inmate must be allowed to apply to proceed under general in forma pauperis provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). See DeBlasio v. Gilmore, 315 F.3d 396, 399 (4th Cir. 2003); see also Webb v. Lambert, No. CV…